Last year I made my 'Charlie's Angels' (2000 & 2003) fan zine before the latest in the franchise, rather than a reboot, was in cinemas. It took me a while but I finally got to see what all the fuss was about (the cast) and why critics and audiences weren't so keen on the film.
The fact that Elizabeth Banks directed made a huge (and better) difference and change from the tone of the previous male gaze galore films which I both love and hate. But that didn't mean that the latest escaped the 'costume' moment and the utterly pointless dance routine sequence AND weird creepy hitman. At least the latter for something to look at.
Previously published on Vulturehound here.
The Townsend Agency, now expanded across the globe, with many Bosley’s and Angels, called upon for missions with different teams. Rebellious and carefree Sabina is teamed up with humourless and straightforward Jane for a mission in Hamberg when Elena, an engineer and programmer turns whistle-blower on her company’s latest project, a tool that can be weaponised. When the mission goes wrong, Elena becomes more than just the client but learns what it takes to be an ‘Angel’ while the team try to find out what’s actually happening and who is really behind weaponised tech and trying to sell in.
Instead of the announced reboot, the film is actually a continuation of the McG era films, even going so far as forgetting that Bill Murray and Bernie Mac played Bosley but literally erasing them from the film and inserting Patrick Stewart’s face into ‘past photos’. Making Stewart the original Bosley and making him retire early on in the film sends red flags almost immediately, which is a shame as from this moment on, the film is very predictable. Some reboots or late sequels try to make a film all about a new character but the film luckily doesn’t fall into this trap and keeps the ‘getting to know’ the new characters simple, with random information given out during the film as it’s not about them, it’s about the story, which is still enjoyable, even though its predictable.
Elizabeth Banks who stars, acts and wrote the screenplay is the best part of the whole film. Her character has layers, is amusing and being a formal angel herself, has the grit about her too. However, the actual active angels are stereotypical annoyances. Kristen Stewart desperately plays up the ‘wild card’ character, going as far as yelling lines that didn’t need to be. Ella Balinska plays her character as a robot for most of the film, vaguely letting lose when she’s supposed to be flirting, she really doesn’t seem like she is having any fun at all during this film. Naomi Scott is probably the most decent out of the three, playing the ‘newbie’ and genius engineer she has more to do. But Banks really saves the day here.
Ultimately the film is just fun. There are no mind-blowing moments, intricate plot points or anything more than skin deep happening, it’s just a fun action film with women as the leads. It is worth noting that there are no romantic sub plots, except maybe one tiny scene with the actor who is in all those Netflix films, it’s nice to see him breaking out of the small screen. But be prepared to going back to basics, complete with shady evil English ‘bad guys’ and a tattooed assassin who I wish we’d got to know more about. Overall, the film will keep you entertained and wondering if we’ll see this ‘franchise’ again in a few more years.
