Thursday Movie Picks: Halloween Edition: Ghost Movies

Don't forget to check out what Wandering Through the Shelves picked, the blog that started Thursday Movie Picks.

1. Blackbeard's Ghost

Family friendly Disney film about a blood thirsty pirate ghost who haunts a inn by the coast run by a group of little old ladies. They're trying to raise money to save the inn from being torn down when Dean Jones' out of towner arrives and releases Blackbeard's ghost which happens to be the amazing Peter Ustinov. Slapstick comedy commences, with invisible happenings, fights with no one and the excessive use of a wire. It's amusing but I have to admit, I laughed a hell of a lot more when I was 10 years old. 

2. Beetlejuice

 

This will and rightly so will be on many a-list. The ultimate (apart from Ghostbusters) ghost film as Beetlejuice is one of the best creations to come out of Tim Burton's head and Michael Keaton himself. I do love Keaton and this is one of Burton's classics. Of course it does make me weep a little inside when I think if the trope Burton has created lately. Beetlejuice is a bio-exorcist and a really hope he materialises in time to stop and squash these rumours about a sequel. It doesn't need one dammit.

3. Blithe Spirit

Adapted from Noel Coward's classic play, a play that I almost featured in at my local am-dram society. I was to be Edith the maid. Yes. That's not a big role but who cares. Alas the play never happened because the lead actress was pretty useless and never learnt her lines. Anyway, on with the British classc 1945 film where novelist Charles, invites an eccentric 'medium' Madame Arcati to conduct a seance. Unfortunately the result is appearence of the ghostly form of his first wife, Elvira who only he can see and speak to. It's a light comedy and is very terribly British which I like as it makes all the would be dramatic moments controlled and even more amusing. 

October Watch List

Man Up

 First off, I love both the leads. Simon Pegg because of Spaced, mainly and from there onwards. Lake Bell is awesome. I loved her debut, In A World... as she wrote, directed and starred. She is actually one of the very few American actors I don't mind putting on an English accent, mainly because she does it so naturually. The story is fun too plus you get to see bits of London, Southbank, my favourite place AND Waterloo which I see almost on a weekly basis, something thrilling about that. The poster pretty much says it all, right time, right place, wrong date. Two people are on a blind date but she's not the right person but it turns out they are a perfect match. Its funny, I laughed quite a few times which is usually rare with rom-coms. I have faith now that the gener might get better. Fingers crossed. Oh yes, Simon Pegg does cry in this film. He does that quite a bit. 3/5

Life

 

The director, Anton Corbijn, used to be a photographer, he has an excellent eye, which is what made his debut Control so well done and beautiful to watch. The subject here is blurred between two people, James Dean and the photographer who helped make him an icon, Dennis Stock. Stock wants to be famous himself or at least be able to make credible art not just movie stills. He meets James Dean, played pitch perfectly by Dane DeHaan, by chance at a party before he got the role of a lifetime in Rebel Without a Cause. James is looking for a friend, so it seems, but Dennis wants to make art. The film is set 7 months before James Dean died and although its not addressed at all, no major hints, just subtle things, this event we all know happens looms over the entire film.

Its not about James Dean, its actually about Dennis Stock but Dean, like always, steals the attention. It's an odd subject for a film. I wish we saw more of the photographs than just at the end in the credits. Throughout we see how they were made and how the people felt at the time which was interesting, but the film dragged a bit too much. DeHaan was definitely the film stealer here. 3/5

Macbeth 

I do like Shakespeare but I am more of a fan of the comedies rather than the tragedies. I studied Macbeth at school like many others and we saw countless versions of it, good and bad. I've not seen any of the Macbeth films apart from a filmed stage version. This film is both visually striking and beautiful at the same time which is an odd way to describe this violent play. This is how this story was meant to be seen. Everything from the cast, the costume, the setting and the beyond amazing scenary. 'Be bloody, bold, and resolute' can illustrate the mind and motive of Macbeth. I'm hoping most know the story of Macbeth, a play where the protagonsits (that's including Lady Macbeth) are evil and not people to cheer for. But if not, rather than me ruin it here, seek it out, maybe just a summary somewhere, but its best discovered in a book first then play then film. Sound snobby but I think its needed. I've seen a few Shakespeare plays without being familiar with the text and not enjoyed it as much at all. 4/5

I did have a lot more to discuss about this film but the film festival was a big distraction. I will add more later, hopefully.

The Martian

When this was first announced I wasn't too keen on watching it. If I saw it, I saw it. The trailer looked good but again, I wasn't too bothered. My friends were more keen than me. Having watched it, it was everything I expected, feeling an ache the whole way through, scrabbling around in my seat at the more difficult scenes, not enough Sean Bean. But it was a brilliant film, Ridley Scott has emerged from the Russel Crowe obsessed darkness, dusted off his alien suit and come up with an adaptation of the novel of the same name that is beyond the spectrum of the definition of survival. There are too many things to mention is a short paragraph, so forgive me if I ramble. After an expedition to Mars is cut short by a disaster, Astronaut Mark Watney is thought to be dead and the rest of the crew of Ares lll leaves to go back to Earth. But Watney is alive. To survive Watney oragnises the food rations he has while trying to gain contact with NASA. When NASA work out that Watney is alive through satalite pictures of the planet, they kick into action.

The film poses many questions, some being difficult to face. Do they save this one man for sake of billions of dollars? Do they ask a crew of 5 to risk their lives for the sake of one man? It sounds harsh but when you're watching the film, you start to see things from everyone's point of view, NASA, the engineers, the crew of the Ares lll but with Watney, its different. The scenes with just him are brilliantly done and the fact that Watney the Botney, he's a botanist, is that he has a winning spirit that is unparalleled with any other survivor. He doesn't sit around at any point, apart from one scene where he's watching Happy Days, he is always working, whether it is growing potatoes on Mars, writing out long messages to communicate with NASA or trying to fix a broken window on the hub. He is the key to all of the film. The intense scenes that I found myself squirming in my seat involve being stranded in space and floating around hoping to be caught. I find those scenes stressful. But that aside, its a great film, with a brilliant cast and core. As I said, Ridley Scott is back everyone! 4/5

Everest

After watching The Martian I threw myself at another nail biting story that I didn't realise was based on real events. Of course, we do not know for sure what happened on the mountain smmit which depicts those who lost their lives, but my god it felt real. A complete tragedy and loss of life all for the sake of climbing an impossible mountain. The climbers, leaders and followers alike ask the question 'why do they do this' and  they answer 'beacuse it's there'. You can apply to this literally anything though, why do we do these things? Because we can. Because we want to. Because we need to. All the climbers have their own reasons for being there and we only get an insight to a few in depth, such as expedition leader Rob Hall and Beck Weathers, an experienced climber and author of one of the books that the film takes its knowledge from. The gruelling conditions that these climbers put themselves through are painful and in some cases heartbreaking, especially for those who you know died on the mountain. This film could easily put classed as a disaster film as nature is the cause of all the problems but there something about the people involved in this tragedy that makes it an true life story (and it is with added cinematic touches). It is an emotional film. And views are incredible. 3/5

Crimson Peak

'Beware of Crimson Peak'. This is the hook that got me in the trailer, after seeing the beautiful gothic images of course. I thought I could handle ghost films, but I was hiding under my scarf during some bits of this film, as my friend, he had his jacket covering his face. Like cowards huddled under a blanket for safety we were spooked, but, we both agreed after the film, there wasn't enough ghost bits. The film location, set and not to mention the beautiful costumes are all visually amazing. These create an excellent introduction to Del Toro's gothic setting. The story is a little too predictable but the hidden secrets which our heroine Edith discovers upon arrival, are sinister enough to scare the hell out of you. The ghosts, when we do see them, are spirits, twisted and disturbed or wonderfully dressed all with a smoke like presence that I haven't seen before. These ghosts are elegant and actually bring warnings to help the living and it is the living that should be feared. You know, that old chestnut. But despite the predictable story and lack of ghostly bits, the film has enough atmoshpere and Tom Hiddleston to keep me watching. Technically a three person show who all show they're strengths is slightly different roles from previous ones, makes it interesting to watch (enough though you know the out come). 3/5

Sicario

I was in two minds about this film. I've read so much about and yet these articles and reviews barely give anything away. I understand why but I can't agree with everything I've read. The part Emily Blunt plays, Kate Macer, was originaly meant for a male actor. To be honest, the part is gender neutral. But I'm glad Blunt was cast otherwise there would have been no women in the film. That is pretty bad. Macer is an FBI agent brought in on a mission by the CIA and army. The purpose was to collect a senior member of the Mexican cartel back to the USA. We all know as much as Macer does and that is barely anything. She is literally there to observe. It's irritating. Aside from the uncomfortable tension throughout that does build up to an event that both brilliant and terrible, that irritating feeling haunted me throughout the film. It was a good thriller but like Macer, I was annoyed at the lack of information provided and the feeling of being left in the dark was mutual. The scenes between Blunt and Benicio del Toro are some of the best scenes, no matter how short, in the film. They seem to be wary of each other and even at some point trust each other but ultimately they both have their own stronge principles that go against each other. I gave it a higher rating originally but I switched to lower as I though I gave it higher only because of Blunt. But overall it needed a little more light on the situation. 3/5

Blind Spot: Cinema Paradiso

Although I picked Cinema Paradiso to be in my list, I have a confession to make. I have actually seen the first 20-30 minutes of the film. It was back in yesteryear, in Italian class, I was sitting at the front of the class nearest the door, it was a terrible place to be. As it was nearly the end of that term, not sure if it was Spring or Summer, but our teacher, who spoke to us in Italian produced Cinema Paradiso and then in English said we would watch this film instead of doing work, as a treat. I hated the film. This was mostly due the fact the TV was practically above me and the subtles were so small. Even though this film has been raved about, one so many awards (the film actually starts with a list), I have avoided it.

Now that I have seen it all, my attitude has changed as how could I hate a film that celebrates those who love film.

The tag line on the poster pretty much expresses what this film is about. A picturesque village with many 'characters'. A beyond beautiful friendship. A heartbreaking love story (with no resolution by the way). And of course the cinematic love of films projected throughout.

At first I wondered where I would watch the film. I had bought a few on my list to watch but as Cinema Paradiso was the one film I wasn't too keen to watch, I didn't want to have it on my shelf. But Netflix came the rescue. After watching the film, I take back everything I said about it. But you can see how watching a film at the wrong time or wrong place can either ruin or cause false enjoyment.

Toto lives in a picturesque village in Italy where he is a choir boy at church, attends the local school and like all the other villagers attends screenings at the run down cinema in the town square. After Toto sneaks into a screening where the priest decides what scenes have to be cut, mostly kissing scenes, he strikes up an unlikely friendship with the projectionist, Alfredo. He teaches him how to work in the projection booth at the cinema and helps fuel Toto's love for film. 

His mother disapproves at first, still holding on to the belief that her husband survived the war and waiting to come home. When Toto hordes bits of film at home, it causes a fire almost killing his sister. His mother forbids Toto from seeing Alfredo. But the true friends strike a deal. Toto helps Alfredo pass his school tests (he was going to night school) and Alfredo teaches him. 

After a tragic accident involving the cinema going up in flames, Alfredo is badly injured and left blind. Toto takes over. A newly wealthy resident in the village restores the cinema and takes over. Toto works as the projectionist. He falls in love with a local girl who comes from a wealthy family in the town. They enjoy a few months together until she is forced to go away for the summer. They reunite for a short time and there where they share the cinematic kiss in the rain. But Toto is called up to complete his military service. He never sees her again.

Upon returning to the town, Toto finds things are different but the same. Alfredo urges him. To leave and seek a better life in Rome. He tells him not to return, don't give into nostalgia. He tells him do something he loves. 

Years later, an older Toto, now a successful filmmaker, receives a call from his mother telling Alfredo has died. Having not been back to his hometown for 30 years, he returns. It's different. The squareis filled with cars, the Cinema Paradiso is run down, closed because no one goes anymore. But at the funeral, Toto sees all the people from his past. It's an emotional scene as he acknowledges them all with a simple nod of the head, but it means a lot.

Toto rewatches footage he filmed in his youth including a film of the girl he fell in love with and hasn't forgotten. He returns to Rome and in the final scene, he watches the film Alfredo left him. It's a reel of all the scenes that were cut, all the kissing, love and affectionate scenes from all the films. This moves Toto to tears of joy that his old friend has kept this for him all these years.

It's a beautiful film with a simple story and unfortunately a back dub. It was in Italian but that dub was quite bad. Overlooking this, the film, for me, was about finding a true friend and staying true to something you love. In a way the blip of a love story in the film rather spoilt this emotional journey but I suppose it was needed to give Toto a push to leave. The winning paring in the film is obviously Alfredo and Toto (young and old). The two don't act like father and son but friends, piers and that's a combination that is not often portrayed on screen, at least not in happy way.

The passing of time is dramatic but is not over the top. Fashion is different but it's the attitude of the people that is different. The fact the priest has to approve a film taking out all the affection and love, whereas by the 60s, films showing naked women are screened. The one element that is consistent, are the people of the village. The cinema brings people together and creates a bond with everyone, even at the end when the cinema is torn down.

The love of film is the main theme that I can resonate with. Sometimes there is no reason to love film. It's about story, it's about community, it's about the magic and escapism, but what it comes down to is something you can share with a great friend. Brilliant film and I'm so glad I gave it another chance otherwise I would have missed out on all those moments of cinematic bliss.

To see where it all started and for an excellent insight to film, have a look at The Matinee and have a look HERE for more Blind Spot posts from other bloggers.

BFI Film Festival - The Wave

I'm not sure why I was drawn to this film as this was the first film I picked when I was looking through the programme. My instinct didn't disappoint.

The director, Roar Uthaug, along with two of his lead actors were present at the Q&A before and after. He thanked us for coming to see a Norwegian disaster film and noted several times, this could happen. It has happened before.

 The film starts with real footage from a disaster where 40 people died after a landslide. The intro warns us that it will happen again. In the same town as the first catastrophe, the tourist town of Geiranger, local geologist genius, Kristian is preparing to move to the city with his family for another job, away from his beloved mountain. After a small reading plagues Kristian, he goes back to his colleagues who believe he is being over cautious. But as, he he feared, the mountain is moving and a landslide causing rock to fall into the water creating a 250 foot tidal wave is about to hit the town. With only 10 minutes to get to higher ground, Kristian's family, now separated, have to try to survive. After the wave hits, by a miracle Kristian survives and goes looking for his family who are still trapped somewhere in the town.

Already a success in Norway, apprently just under 1 million people have seen the film and as the population of the country is 5 million, that is insanely brilliant. A fifth of the population have seen the film. The science of the film is that the fact that Norway has 300 or more unstable mountainsides, sooner or later these landslides will occur, but Uthaug did say there is technology in place that will ensure the people affected will have a longer warning than 10 minutes.

It didn't feel like a standard Hollywood disaster film. This may because the budget was considerably less, not that would change brilliance of The Wave. But I couldn't help thinking that it just wouldn't work if Hollywood tried to remake this. For one thing, it wouldn't make sense setting this type of story and disaster in the states. With Norway's landscape and mountains playing the part of a character, the setting is integeral to the story in it making sense and the old saying, beauty can be cruel. The views are literally breathtaking.

The family unit who take centre stage are also different to a Hollywood family. As a member if the audience pointed out, most American families in disaster films are 'dysfunctional' and have an on going conflict they have to 'work out' through the disaster and while its happening. In The Wave, the family are caring and yes, endearing. Sondre, the teenage son, is upset about leaving the town but it's not something that over powers the story. Same with Idun, Kristian's wife who is annoyed he delayed the moving plans after panicking and climbing into them mountain to check sensors. But again, this is not important as soon as the alarm bells ring and the wave hits. The story is about survival and determination. Kristian is with his young daughter, Julia, running up the moutain to higher ground, while Idun and Sondre are still in town. The latter two have no choice after they miss the bus, to climb down into a bunker to escape the destruction but not before the bunker waist high filled with water and slowly starts to fill. They all want to survive, then after the wave hits, the third part of the film starts with Kristian determined to find his son and wife.

Uthaug said that the decision to make the family caring and loving towards each other was a conscious decision as he wanted the audience to care about the fates of these characters and after squirming uncomfortably in my seat for 20 minutes during a water scene, you can bet I wanted a happy outcome. The tention in the water scenes, where Idun and Sondre are trapped in the bunker under a building, is just awful. I couldn't sit still. Sign of good filmmaking getting a reaction like that. My friend who I saw it with agreed, its one of the first things we said to each other after.

The Wave is definitely a force to be reckoned with and has even been selected as Norway's submission for the Best Foreign Language Film for the Oscars. With news that the films is gaining more and more attention there is hope it will get a UK release date (and US I believe). Go see it when it does.

Thursday Movie Picks: Halloween Edition: Werewolves

I don't watch any horror, but I have watched films that have either horror elements in them or are remakes or reboots of classic horror characters like The Mummy and The Wolfman and Frankenstien. Here is my very short list of films that feature werewolves. I was tempted just to have this be the whole post: http://bit.ly/VymZ6

1.  Underworld

I remember seeing the sequel at the cinema, it was during my school years. I also remember buying the DVDs then selling them years later thinking why the hell did I buy these. Underworld was on TV quite a bit too at the time. It was essentially a vampire film but in the first film, theres a war going between vamps and lycans (fancy name for werewolves). I remember they or someone else engineered silver liquid bullets? Then then werewolves made UV light bullets to kill the vamps. Anyway, after watching the first film, it didn't seem the obvious choice for a franchise but at least Kate Beckinsale got something out of it.

2. Dog Soldiers

I saw this by accident. I thought it was a war film. I recoginsed some of the actors and though, sure I'll watch this alone at night. I was freaked out as soon as I realised what I was watching. I stuck with it though and yes, I regret it. But through the gore and scares, it is actually a decent British horror film. Of course it goes without saying I will never see it again.

3. The Wolfman

This came out when I was at Uni, my friends and I were all excited to see it for one reason or another, (mine was Benicio Del Toro) and then we were all disappointed. It wasn't that great. It had a great cast and was all set to bring back the classic monsters but instead of a classic monster movie, it was just a run of the mill Victorian werewolf film, with not much of twist. I actually can't remember the end.

Don't forget to check out what Wandering Through the Shelves picked, the blog that started Thursday Movie Picks.

BFI Film Festival - Burn Burn Burn

Coming to the end of the festival, I couldn't have planned it better, in terms of films, or worse, in terms of travel. The last two films I saw ended the festival this year with a bang.

Having to trek out to deepest darkest East London on a Sunday morning was not what I wanted to do to be honest, but when I read about the film in the programme, there was something that made me make the effort. I think it was that it was about two friends going on a road trip to scatter the ashes of their recently departed friend. Another attraction to the film that, yes, I noted it was written by a woman and directed by a woman. This was the only film I picked knowing these details. Plus, its a British film. I had to see at least one British film at the festival or I would seem a tad ridiculous.

 

Alex and Seff, two close friends are bequethed the ashes of the friend Dan who has died from cancer. He sends them on a road trip around the UK to scatter his ashes with a video to accompany them. While trying to come to terms with the loss of their close friend, Alex and Seff have to come clean about a few other truths about themselves. Alex, who keeps secrets and has just witness her long term girlfriend cheat on her. Seff, a failing actress taking a nanny job that her devoted boyfriend got her. She is dealing with the fact that she might not love him afterall either.

With British names in comedy appearing for a few scenes along the journey really made the story feel like a road film. The writing was pitch perfect, with comedy from the likes of Sally Phillips stepping in with a crazy accent and then Alison Steadman who has one of the affective scenes the film bringing the emotional balance and shwoing the heart of these characters. Laura Carmichael and Chloe Pirrie as Seff and Alex are a great duo, not quite polar opposites but they work of each other creating a very believable friendship.

 

Written by Charlie Covell and directed by Chanya Button, this is the debut feature film from the latter and couldn't be more brilliant. Both creatives were present at the screening which happened to be only the second screening ever as the film had its world premiere the night before. The two are friends and obviously work really well together. They bounced off of each other and the audiences' reactions. They were not shy and answered everything and more, giving an insight to their work and just being genuinely funny people, which was brilliant to witness. At one point in the Q&A, Button and Covell took turns saying how much they loved Alison Steadman, also present at the screening, she addressed the audience saying 'I'm sure you're enjoying watching us gush over each other' and they continued to the delight of audience.

The usual questions were asked about the fact it was about two female friends and asking why Covell decided to write this story. Covell joked at first saying that she had a friend, Button, and that seemed like a good place to start. She went on to say, stories about two platonic friends aren't usually made. The stories usually involve a group and then a romantic angle. She explained that it was important that the relationship was platonic because this is what happens in life, these characters are relateable. It was also important that the relationship between Alex, Seff and Dan was also platonic as, Covell pointed out, you do have friends that you are not attracted to. Of course this got a laugh from the audience its true, films that show what life is like are not made often enough.

As quite a few audience members said, more of this please, great female characters on screen being who they are. I feel myself gushing now, but I do think this film is brilliant and I really hope its distributed so you can see all the fuss I'm making.

BFI Film Festival - Dégradé

Continuing my theme of female protagonists, Dégradé, directed and written by Palestinian filmmakers Arab and Tarzan (also known as Mohammed Abunasser and Ahmed Abunasser) is about a group of women, different ages, different lives who have all come to a salon one afternoon. Set against and actually filmed during the 2014 war in Gaza, the film has comedic moments but there is an uneas, almost uncomfortable feeling throughout the film as the women are at first friendly or tolerent of each other and then turn on each other with unlikely characters taking a stand to unite them and calm everyone down.

The main story is about 12 women who are all in a salon and are forced the lock down when shooting begins outside. All the characters have their time to talk, making it clear who they are. Amongst them is a wealthy women who is negotiating her divorce with her lover. Another customer is bride to be who is accompanies by her mother, her mother in law to be and her daughter. A pregant woman and her sister. Two neighbours who are polar opposites, one very religious, the other a pill popping liberal, or at least that what she appears as. The salon owner, a Russian immigrant and the hairstylist who is preoccupied as her boyfriend is one of the men outside involved with the shooting.

Each character is defined in what they believe and are aware of what's happening around them and unfortunately, all seem to accept their 'place' in their own stories/lives. At least the characters that have more to say than others. Obviously there is a bigger issue happening outside and it isn't really discussed, not in a serious way. It is mentioned and when the shooting starts, several of the characters say 'something has happened outside'. They don't say anything about shooting, even when then they have to barricade themselves in. In an effort to calm themselves, the salon owner continues working on the bride while the wealthy women gets annoyed with the hairstylist who almost in tears from the stress. They all just try to continue as calmly as possible.

The location was an excellent choice, where else would a diverse group of women go, a salon. Although I'm tempted to compare to Nadine Labaki's 'Caramel', its definitely not the same. Not the same country to start with but the idea of women coming together in the salon. I also thought of Hitchcock's Lifeboat, as the only location used is the salon, both floors. The one location created the perfect atmosphere, at first a source of annoyance, then violence, then camaraderie.

The producer of the film at the Q&A said that there aren't many films featuring women in Gaza. He made a point that the women of Gaza do all the things that any other women do, talk about lovers, take drugs, have political views and that this film is meant to reflect this. Woman have to be shown and heard too. With such an array of characters, they are heard. But I can't help feeling that more should have been said.

Overall, a brilliant cast and interesting film showcasing views that barely get seen.

BFI Film Festival - The Brand New Testament

A brilliant take on religion, morality and the small things in life. Directed and written by Jaco Van Dormael and boasting an amazing cast of French and Belgian actors and a focus on Brussels, a city I hope to visit again, literally is a brand new take on God, JC and how the world was created. God is real and he lives in Brussels.

 The story is mostly narrated by God's daughter, Ea. She lives with her father and oppressed bullied mother in a standard flat with no front door. From the view through their windows it seems they are in tower block in the middle of Brussels.

 

From the start Ea explains that God is a horrible bully who treats his creations like toys, creating manny disasters and little annoyances all from his computer in a study that has endless file drawers containing the population of Earth. The study is forbidden but after Ea calls him out on his cruelty he beats her. After asking her brother, JC for advice, a hilarious little scene where he admits that he 'just winged it' when he went out into the world. Ea decides to go out and find her own Apostles, picked at random of course. Also, she, like her brother has powers, which her father is obviously jealous of. It all starts when Ea releases everyone's death dates complete with countdowns. From here we briefly see all the Apostles and their death dates. A mixed group with various dates. Unfortunately the youngest, a boy same age as Ea, has days to live. Ea goes on a journey after finding a willing scribe, homeless man named Victor, and seeks out her chosen Apostles. Each section is delightfully called 'The Gospel According to...' Witha short intro and their reaction to knowing the death date. Each one takes it differently. Dramatic or calm the little observations are brilliant. After the Apostles gather to say goodbye to Willy who has a serious illness a miracle happens. Having left the computer is shut down mode, Ea's mother, a Goddess in her own right, unplugs the computer to vacuum the office. She restarts everyone and everything, giving everyone a second chance and taking over from her husband who went after Ea but due to him being an awful person has no place on Earth. Through a series of humorous events he ends up being deported to a random country as he has no ID. After all no would believe you were God dressed in sandals, long shorts and a dressing gown.

 Having a young girl, wise way beyond her years, makes the film run smoothly and let's people believe this could be legit, she is the daughter of God. The Apostles all accept her with few questions but this also might be due to the death dates being released they have to come to terms with their own reality and mortality. Everything that happens to Ea is all played out straight faced and matter of fact. She is kind and caring and therefore greeted as a friend. God is rude, nasty and selfish and what happens to be is believably. We are made in his image after all and we can be like this.

I'm not religious and to be honest nothing that is said in the film could be seen as blasphemies. This is an interpretive look at a Brand New Testament. There a few nods to the Bible and JC as he is fondly called, there are even some clever bits thrown in there, but ultimately I think the biggest moment is when Ea's mother steps in and makes things different, maybe for the better. Ultimately saying, a woman should be in charge. But that might be the feminist in me hoping that. 

I laughed out loud several times. It's brilliant film with emotional strength at the core showing that people can surprise you and as long as you have friends around you, you're doing ok. Just have faith. But you know what I mean when I say that.

BFI Film Festival - Wedding Doll

Every year, the films I pick at the festival always seem to follow a theme without me realising. One year it was all about fathers and daughters, another year was all about the rule of 3, this year, its been about women. Maybe its the films or I unconsciously picked them because the stories were about women or made by women.

The two films I saw today were both about women and were both written and directed by men. One film (which I will post later) was Palestinian and Wedding Doll is an Israeli film.

 Wedding Doll is a drama about a young women, Hagit, with learning disabilities who is obsessed with being married and having a wedding. She lives with her mother, Sarah, who over protective and doesn't allow her daughter much independance. Hagit works in a small family run toilet paper factory where she seems happy, making little wedding dolls from the toilet rolls. She is also secretly meeting up with her employee's son, Omri. But when it is announced that the factory will close, Sarah starts to worry even more. She is late to work, misses dates with her boyfriend and restricts Hagit is many things, including what jobs to apply for. With the factory closing, Omri decides to leave town but on the night before his friends meet at the facory for 'going away' party and ask Hagit to come along, pretending its a wedding. Hagit dresses in a creation of her own, a wedding dress constructed from metal hoops and toilet rolls.

The story is understated and the performances brilliant, especially Moran Rosenblatt as Hagit. Focusing on mostly on Hagit and how she wishes to be independant and be 'normal' and then on the mother daughter relationship. At times Hagit wants to be on her own but Sarah is the one that needs stability and over protects her daughter, she seems to prefer routine. Every morning Hagit tries to get away from her mother giving her a lift to work but by the end of the day, she is smiling at her mother who collects her at the end of the day. At one point, Sarah, overwhelmed at what to do, falls asleep in linen cupboard at the hotel where she works and forgets to collect Hagit. Hagit, just looks for a moment at the empty space then walks home. She is capable of doing things by herself when given the chance, it's just a shame her mother doesn't see this. Sarah always seemd to be saying 'I haven't found a solution for Hagit'. Yet the solution is right under her nose. There are hints to past trauma that make actions from other characters understandable. Hagit's brother is unhappy to see his mother when Hagit is mentioned, Sarah apologises for her actions saying it was an accident. Hagit keeps scratching a scare on her back, this is mentioned a couple of times that children attacked her after she thought she was being invited to play with them. There isn't really any closure concerning the mother and daughter, just that they move on to another place together. A few people in the Q&A mentioned that this was sad as Hagit still hadn't gotten away. Rosenblatt said that she would have ended the film a scene earlier to avoid that frame, but the director Nitzan Giladysaid that after test screenings, the audience wanted more. But at that point the film ended with Hagit wandering into the dark. I think the ending was fine, if a bit too quick. I would have liked to see or have a hint to Hagit getting at least one wish.

Another element in the story was the relationship between Omri and Hagit. At first it seemed that the attraction was one sided with Omri just being nice. But, as with a few other things in the film, the two have a routine. He throws stones up at her window and they meet on the edge of town and look out at the crater. He is sweet to her, admiring her skills at making delicate dolls and even makes some binoculars out of toilet roll for her. They kiss but that is all, it seems, which is all thats needed in the film. Throughout the film is becomes more and more obvious that Omri really does have feelings for Hagit, but he is ashamed to tell his friends and doesn't truely openly admitt that he does to Hagit. Another part to this, which is also upsetting, is that Omri's father really likes Hagit at the factory, looking out for her and allowing her to make toilet roll art on the wall. But as soon as he finds out that his son and her could be more, he shuts everything down. He doesn't want that to go further. This just adds to a feeling of rejection towards Hagit which makes her a sympathetic character whom you desparately want her to have something good happen or at least have hope. Maybe the ending could have been different? Although you feel the most for Hagit, you also get to see and understand from Sarah's point of view too.

This is Nitzan Gilady debut feature film and I really enjoyed this story and loved the two central characters. Gilady said, in the Q&A that he tried to be actor first in USA, where he was typecast as a terroist and in Israel where he didn't have much luck either. He wrote the film while living in the town where the film is set and filmed. Someone asked, 'why toilet paper'? and he laughed and said that he was depressed and that he didn't like living there. The end of the film, Hagit and Sarah leave, so this might be that same need that Gilady had when he was writing. He also mentioned that the inspiration for the idea for the film came from when he was doing street theatre. Three women were dressed in dresses similar to the one Hagit constructs, they roamed the streets looking for a husband. He said he had a photograph of one of these women screaming. He was transfixed by this and wondered what type of person this could be. It's definitely a bizarre origin story of a story.

As I said, I really enjoyed this film, possibley one of my favourites and I'm only a little halfway through.

BFI Film Festival - Madonna

Thankfully, the South Korean film, Madonna, is not about the American singer. If it had been I would have walked out. Another film, I'm happy to say was directed and written by a female filmmaker, Shin Su-won. Unfortunately, this screening had no Q&A, which can happen, but I was hoping there would be as I would have liked to hear from the maker why she made the film.

Not to lead to any misunderstanding, the film was brilliant but it is a story that I do not wish to see again. Mostly due to a couple of scenes that were too harrowing and in fact the life of 'Madonna' is harrowing.

The story is about hospital worker, nurses' aide, Ms Moon who is put in charge of the Chairman of the hospital in the VIP ward of the hospital. The Chairmain has been left paralyzed and has been in the hospital for years. His son, Mr Kim, stays close by making sure his father stays alive at all costs. When a brain dead youny women who is later to be discovered pregnant, asks Ms Moon to track down a next of kin to sign a organ donation form, we understand that he wants his father alive as he is motivated by money. Ms Moon looks into the life of Jang Mi-na, who resorted to prostitution while pregant. Moon works backwards to when Jang Mi-na was at school where she was bullied by the teacher for having brown hair. Then when she was older and worked at an insurence company where her boss took advantage of her and eventually forced her to quit. Then finally when she worked in a cosmetic factory where she was raped by a co-worker. She attacked him and fled in panic but she was found by him again and again raped by a group of men and left for dead on the roadside. Between the flashbacks we Ms Moon tries to convince Mr Kim to save the girl's baby and also develops, literally, an unspoken bond with the Chairman.

The flashbacks of Jang Mi-na's life is sad and desperate. She's a sweet person but too naive. Her nickname is 'Madonna' because she was a virgin, until she is raped by the co-worker and she never had sex with any clients while a prostitute, but did other things for them. Ms Moon is also an interesting character who we don't really get to know until her flashback is shown near the end of the film. It explains her motivation and need to help this girl, not only because of all the things she hears from others but that she felt she was forced into a desparate situation. Again another scene that was devastating and all it was was a woman crying her eyes out over a suitcase with the added sound effect of a baby crying.

For me, this film was all about story. There were some great shots, the Ms Moon flashback was beautiful and tragic, but this film belonged to the characters, both Jang Mi-na and Ms Moon were superb as victim and would-be detective. I'm still quite disturbed by the some of the scenes but in filmmaking they had a purpose and it had the desired effect. A brilliant film, I think I will seek out Shin Su-won first two films.

BFI Film Festival - Sworn Virgin

One of the section in the festival is called 'Journey'. This section usually has some interesting stories and usually the stories are not about a an actual journey in terms of travel, they are personal, physical, emotional and internal. Sworn Virgin is Laura Bispuri first deature film, unfortunately she wasn't able to attend my particular screening, but the producer was there and explained how Bispuri came across this story, as the film was based on a novel of the same name by Elvira Dones. She said that this was a story that Bispuri needed to tell.

Sworn Virgins are "women who take a vow of chastity, wear mens clothing and live as a man in the patriarchal northern Albanian society." Women also have known to become Sworn Virgins in Kosovo, Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, parts of Croatia and Bosnia. According to National Geographic's Taboo, there are supposedley less than 102 sworn virgins today.

This film is about Hana who is taken in my another family in her village after her parents die. Her adopted father, Arten, recognises something in her after watching her chop wood and fire a gun. After her sister Lila runs away from an arranged marriage to be with the man she loves, Hana makes the descision to become a sworn virgin. Fourteen years later Hana, now known as Mark leaves her village in the Albanian mountains and travel to Italy to see her sister. Their reunion is awkward and uneasy at first but slowly and calmly, Mark starts to question her/his new surroundlings. Accompanying Lila's daughter to the swimming pool, Mark/Hana has her first sexual encounter. She gets a job and her own flat. She makes a list of things she needs to do, one being buying a skirt. There is hope by the end that Hana can finally be someone she is happy to be.

There are some beautiful shots of the mountains and the village which are mostly seen in flashbacks to Hana and Lila's oppressive sheltered childhood and young adulthood. The girls are continuously told what they can and cannot do. Their father even says that he has to include a bullet with Lila's dowry just in case her husband is not satisfied with her. The open space and the views are contrast to the freedom that the scenes in Italy provide. The city, with all the buildings and vehicles, provides more freedom to Lila and Hana, both having their own reasons to leave/escape Albania.

The producer talked about a culture clash which I thought was brilliant. How traditions in Albania trancend to outside a community and how its perceived was interesting as although the oppression of women was obviously established, there was also kindness and understanding when Arten, Hana's father didn't punish her for wanting to earn her keep, instead he nutures her interest and skills, even against some villagers wishes. It was also mentioned in the Q&A that Alba Rohrwacher, who is Italian and plays Hana/Mark took the script and learnt Albanian until she was word perfect. Committing to this role was necessary and it paid off.

Rohrwacher was unbelievably subtle and brilliant in her performance but conveys everything about what the character is feeling. She seems unhappy throughout the film, unable to be comfortable. Her way out of oppression is to become a sworn virgin, then when she feels trapped, she leaves familiar surroundings to be lost in another place. As she slowly starts to embrace being a woman, baby steps, like trying on a bra for the first time is painful, even though the bandages she wears make her itch, this all seems too much. But by the end, she is different, small things, like a light colours shirt, faint make up, earrings, her hair worn ever so slightly different makes her transition, not complete but it is obvious she is on her way to discover what she wants from her life.

It was, what I call, a quiet film, and after all the big noises, it was felt good to see this woman's journey of self discovery shown in such a delicate way.

BFI Film Festival - 11 Minutes

At first, I thought this was a thriller. It does have that aspect to it, thanks to the amazing score but overall, this is about impending destruction that can occur from just a few small actions. 11 Minutes, directed by Jerzy Skolimowski, feel like it was going to be a different film but turned into something else. In the Q & A Skolimowski actually mentioned that there were over 80 edits and that he had to write out each storyline separately and the begin to cut into them. There are several characters that interact with each other, even more a brief moment. There are even characters you only see once or twice and there is even a POV for a dog.

 The film starts with short introductions to a few of the characters through filming on a phone, CCTV, laptop camera, skype and an interview camera. This was described by Skolimowski as the prologue to the main feature which was shot beautifully.

We see the various characters and their 11 minutes, but not in a straight forward one by one, the stories interlock, playing with the time line, this is made even more obvious by a shot of water strickling down a building in reverse. Not all the characters experiences are dramatic but their background is and vice versa.

A newly married couple act as the opening and closing sequences, which bring the film full circle and could even possible lay blame to just one person for the, for me anyway, unexpected dramatic closing scene. The newly married couple are filming themselves on their wedding day or day after and their happy. The wife is a model and actress and goes to meet a classic sleazy American producer at a hotel. The husband wakes up in a sweat, he panics as he remembers he put sleeping pills in their drinks and runs over to the hotel to warn her. He also seems worried about the meeting too as he stalks the hotel floor trying to get into the room. Another story is a couple have broken up and the girl gets the dog. A hot dog seller speaks to a group of nuns, giving away his last hot dog before being spat at by a teenager who ensues he was released from prison recently. A group of paramedics go to the aid of a women in labour in cramped buliding where a neighbour has blocked the stairs with a wardrobe. A old man painting the bridge witnesses a stunt shot for a film. A young man tries to rob a pawn shop only to find that the owner has hung himself.

 Throughout the film, several of the characters notice or point out something dark in the sky. A man watching the CCTV traffic footage rubs his screen but a colleague says its a dead pixel, but this is hint there is something more sinister going on. Coupled with a low flying  plane, gives the impression of unease. Skolimowski, said that this was a cancer, a disruption waiting to happen. This impending doom becomes something we are gradually aware is happening or going to happen, in 11 minutes. The end sequence is slowed down for the maximum dramatic effect taking about 2 or 3 minutes to happen when in real time took seconds. I have to say, again, I wasn't expecting the end, at all. I thought it was something else entirely.

A brilliant film overall, a few niggles from me here and there but I won't say anymore as I hope people will see it if it gets released wherever you are.

BFI Film Festival - High-Rise

 High-Rise was definitely one of the main films that I wanted to see. Having read about the original book by J.G. Ballard, author of Crash and Empire of the Son, I was really intrigued to hear that, just a few weeks after me discovering the story, it was going to be made into a film. And here we are. Ben Wheatly, British director said in the Q&A that when he came across the book that he surprised that this wasn't a film already. The story was in good hands.

High-Rise is about the residents of a luxury high rise building, equipt with everything you would need, a school, a supermarket, gym, pool and inside your own flat, all the new technology that's on offer. The building is set apart from the city and society, as the building towers over a gigantic car park where people forget where they have actually left their car. The film is set in 1975, which is when the book was original released so it gives a sense that this film is what the future was thought to be like back then.

As the building starts to loose power, arguemnts break out between the residents on the higher flaws and those on the lowers floors. Chaos and violence ensue. People are murdered, homes are looted, people are bargained with and everyone seems to involved in some sort of orgy. All this happens and almost no one from the 'outside' world interupts. A policeman does drop by, comments on the mess in the lobby (its covered in blood and rubbish) then seems to disappear.

 The film's protagonist is Dr Laing, played superbly by Tom Hiddleston, who is also a BFI Ambassador now, and he is the one that leads us into the building and allows us to be introduced to every aspect of the residents, the building and how it works, he also meets the architect who lives in the gigantic penthouse complete with lavish terrace. He is referred to as the neutral zone and as he wears a grey suit throughout and at one point looses it and paints his flat grey, he does indeed represent a neutral view of high-rise life.

The film is brilliant on every level. Balance between bloody violence and black comedy are perfectly executed. You don't feel connected to any of the characters in the story, apart from Laing, as he is our 'guide', and it doesn't matter, you don't think beyond what the characters are planning or doing, it is actual chaos and continues in that way. In a way, there is no resolution or end, just an indication that life continues.

I did laugh out loud quite frequently and shudder at a few moments too. I enjoyed every bit of it and I am proud that this is a very British film with a very British cast (except Mad Men alumni, Elizabeth Moss). For me, I don't think this film would have worked in another country, mostly to do with the characters that appear, but also, the director. He is known for violent films and latest violence and comedy. I have to admit I have had no desire to see his other films, but High-Rise has made me see the light.

BFI Film Festival - Don't Grow Up

First day, second screening and it was at one of my favourite cinemas in London, The Ritzy in Brixton. It's actually quite easy to get to and from this place and I don't visit it enough so I was excited to see that a few of my film choices were at The Rizty.

The permeance for 'Don't Grow Up' is what got my attention. Part of the 'Cult' section of the programme in the festival, it is about a group of teenagers who live on a island of the coast of England. Everything changes when they wonder into town to find that all the adults have gone crazy and even started killing children. From what I understood, it was going to be a horror/drama/coming of age story. Its really about what it means to be an adult. Plus lots of violence and emotions running high.

 The BFI programme sums it up better than I could. "On an unnamed island, a group of teenage delinquents, in foster care/carehome wake up to find their youth facility eerily abandoned. Making the most of their unprecedented freedom, the kids drink and party, before venturing outside to a local store. Discovering the rest of the town similarly deserted, they suddenly find themselves under siege by a group of crazed adults, one of whom being their absent supervisor. Fleeing for their safety, it becomes clear that a mysterious epidemic has transformed all the grown-ups on the island into deranged killers and now the group must find a way to escape with their lives."

Directed by French director, Thierry Poiraud and co-written with French screenwriter Marie Garel, the film was shot in the Canary Islands and had an almost unknown cast of young British actors and one Spanish actor. It's a strange mix that didn't quite gell together. The fact that the location is unnamed had me trying to desparately guess where the hell the place was. The terrain changed so much. In the Q&A someone asked why Poiraud had set the story in England. He pointed out that he had always pictured the story in England. In France there aren't any islands like this, they don't places like in the film. I think he wanted it to have that British feel to it. With all the actors, it did feel that way, but there are parts in the film where the terrain looks like Spain. Unfortunately. I wondered why he didn't film somewhere in England, we do have plenty islands to pick from.

The film, overall was good but the fact that the script was originally in French did show. I wasn't sure if it was the actors or the script but what was consistently pleasing to look at were the shots, there were some particular beautiful views on this 'island' and there were also some tender scenes that were filmed really well. Another element abou the film that I enjoyed was that the cast were unknown (apart from a Welsh actor who seems to pop up in everything). This was refreshing, as it isn't usually the whole cast who is unknown or relatively unknown. The characters all had their part to play, a bit like a predictable horror version of the Breakfast Club with teenagers in care. The theme of the film, growing up and what does it mean to be an adult is questioned but not always answered.  This is no spoiler with these types of genre films, but when the last two survivors of the group are left, the film looses traction, it takes a break, a much needed break from the chaos and reflects on the addult theme. In the Q&A someone asked about the violence as, yes there are actual children running around with guns, scared of the grown ups murdering everyone, but the director and the actors answered very casually about this. I also wasn't deterred by the violence, apart from one scene that was very bloody, violence is a part of growing up for some people and I think that was coming across. Survival instincts kick in. The tender moments aswell were needed to balance things out but the last few frames made me sigh as I was hoping the story wouldn't go the normal way, self sacrifice.

I saw this film with my friend, which I'm so glad I did. When we were discussing the film and the slightly odd Q & A afterwards, we had the same reaction. It reminded me of a film I saw last years at the festival that didn't get a UK release or at least I never saw it. That film was good but there was something that wasn't quite finished about it. I had the same feeling with 'Don't Grow Up', it didn't feel polished. It felt like the start of something that could be bigger. In fact Poiraud, mentioned in the Q&A after being asking about a sequel, he laughed and said no but he and Garel are working on a possible TV series. That, seemed to make more sense. But I had hoped he would rewind the clock and use the same characters because I think more time to develop, they would work in serial.

I suppose for now, we watch this space for a TV series.

BFI Film Festival - Bang Gang

 First film if this years' festival and just like the title, it started with a bang. Eva Husson's debut feature film, which, as she mentioned that she started writing in London at Faber & Faber workshop, is about a group of teens living in Biarritz who have parties, known as 'Bang Gang' parties where they endulge in sex, drugs, drink and enjoy their freedom to do so.

The film focuses on four teenagers, their points of view and voiceovers are what drive the film. Alex, the host of said parties who has been left in a large 'country house' alone while his mother is away for 9 months. George, the pretty blonde girl who technically instigates the 'bang gang' with a game. She has sex with guys, takes drugs without thinking but really is 'misunderstood' and just wants to find 'someone'. I may be bias in my opinion of George, but we'll get that later. Laetitia, who lives with her over protective father and just wants to experience being a teenager. Then there's Gabriel, the quiet music maker who is on the outside and seems content that way.

Each of the characters go through a change, sometimes its not for the best. The Bang Gang parties themeselves were quite graphic, naked people wandering around everywhere but this element of the film was not there to shock, but for context in how the characters react to each other. The start of the film felt like the story was going in a completely different direction, for all the characters but then it all seemed to fall into the comfort zone set up. The pretty blonde gets her happy ending with the quiet loner who liked her from afar. The arsehole changes his ways after a realisation that is just too late. The brunette who is reminded constantly through the film that she is just not as pretty as her blonde friend. She had a little more to her that wasn't always explored. But saying all this, the film, the story, was pretty damn good.

Eva Husson is a brilliant storyteller (despite my qualms of the stereotypical tropes, but this may be in the casting), everything flowed and was beautifully pictured. Even the mess of the parties was elegant and effortless. The shots of the sky in between intense and mundane moments left like a switch over of the characters or a shift in their feelings. In the Q & A, Husson mentioned that she went over the dialogue with the actors to makes sure it was the type of 'up to date' language that teens used and it showed. There have been too many films with mainly teens that just don't sound right. Another aspect that was surprising to think back on when watching the film, was that many of the actors were not actors. Everything about this film was natural, including the downfall of everyone involved in the parties.

The film has been noticed, in the right way, at quite a few festivals and I'm pleased for several reasons. First and most importantly, the film is written AND directed by a woman, it was obvious that I would mention this. Secondly, its always encouraging to see foreign films having wide coverage, thirdly because if the subject and the content.

A great start to the festival and I can't wait for the next screening and to see what Eva Husson does next.

Thursday Movie Picks: Villainous Children

I though I wasn't going to get my picks in on time as I couldn't think of films that fit this theme, only characters that were villainous. But at the last minute 3 came to mind. Don't forget to check out what Wandering Through the Shelves picked, the blog that started Thursday Movie Picks.

1. Pretty Persuasion

 Ok, so she's a teenager, technically still a child. Kimberly (Evan Rachel Wood) is privileged Beverley Hills bitch. She manipulates her 'friends' into lying about a male teacher sexually harassing them in the most convoluted plot of revenge and its not even against the teacher. There are no winners in this, not even Kimberley.

2. The Good Son

I saw this years ago so my memory of this film is not tip top but I do recall Macaulay Culkin being evil, a miniature psychopath. When Mark (a very young Elijah Wood) goes to live with his extended family after a tragedy, he starts to suspect then witness his counsin Henry's behaviour and soon his aunt does too. It comes to light that Henry (MC) is evil and that he drowned his younger brother and attempts to kill his sister and his mum. It all climaxes on a cliff edge, you know the drill.

3. We Need to Talk About Kevin

This has got to be the ultimate evil child, showing signs of being an evil villain right from the start. Even though the story is about the mother/son relationship, she blames herself for things he did but throughout his whole life he was awful, never really a moment of happiness, at least not shown in the film (should note, not read the book). It's all Kevin, he really is the epitone of 'someone people are just born bad'.

Thursday Movie Picks: Halloween Edition: Alfred Hitchcock Movies

It's the start of Halloween month and as I don't watch much, actually, practically no horror films, I might not be able to do many of the picks this month, but Hitchcock I know and love. Rear Window and Lifeboat are two of my favourites but I wanted to talk/write about three I don't gush about. In fact, the first film is in my top 5. I'm sure all three will appear in other lists though. I was going to pick Marnie, but that is one oddball film, thats including the stranger trailer for it.

1. Shadow of a Doubt

 

If you've seen Stoker, which was loosely based and inspired by Hitchcock's Shadow of a Doubt, you can get a idea about this film. This story is about what is implied and unlike the uncle-niece revelations in Stoker, the neice has better morals. Uncle Charlie is a suspect in a serial killer case - this is not a spolier - and he's very fond of and close to neice Charlotte, she was named after him. He comes to visit and his lies start to unravel but only Charlotte can see whats happening. Queue lots of suspense and intrigue. I think it is one of Hitchcocks better films and also less seen.

2. Rebecca

I'm forever saying; 'I shall never go back to Manderley again' around the house. Don't know why. I just love this film and I like saying it. One of Hitchcock's best (this is in my top 5 Hitchcock films) films. The source material from Daphne Du Maurier is just perfect for Hitchcock's style. This was also an Oscar winner and rightly so. Mysteries surrounding the death of the first Mrs de Winter, which looms over the happiness for the second Mrs and Mr de Winter, as well as the creepy house and even more disturbing housekeeper, Mrs Danvers who was and is obsessed with the first wife. I really do relish films or stories that feature or are named after a character that the audience or reader never meets and Rebecca is a staple for that, as Rebecca was the first Mrs de Winter.

3. Suspicion

I read about this Hitchcock film first and it was the description of the infamous scene of Cary Grant's Johnnie walking up the stairs with the very while glass of milk for his wife, Lina (Joan Fontaine) who is sick in bed. It is at this point where both Lina and the audience decide whether or not he is evil and is about to poison her. Throughout the film, flukes and coincidences happen far too often, especially as they are usually tragic. The film keeps you on the edge of your seat and the quick cut end will annoy me, as it did at the end of North by Northwest. I rather hoped the film would end with the scene on the stairs, far creepier and it leaves you to decide what happened.


 Don't forget to check out what Wandering Through the Shelves picked, the blog that started Thursday Movie Picks.